Rejecter and Rejectee

I usually keep my music stuff and my writing stuff completely separate. Hypnos Recordings and ambient music on the left, weird stories on the right. One side of my face is M. Griffin and the opposite is Michael Griffin, like those white-black split guys on the original Star Trek.

Sometimes, though, I think what I’ve learned by running a moderately successful ambient music record label for the past 13-ish years actually has gives me some insights I can carry over into the fiction thing. Particularly useful is the ability to see the acceptance/rejection process, in which eager young artist tries to gain the approval of the gatekeeper (editor, agent, label head). Having participated in this process from one side for so long, having rejected all kinds of work for all kinds of reasons, helps me understand what it means when I get a story back in the mail (or more often lately, receiving a “sorry, no” email). Also, what it doesn’t mean.

Iin the realm of music, sometimes I’ve received a demo when I really don’t have any more capacity to release new music, regardless of quality. That artist gets a rejection no matter whaty. More often, the backlog isn’t quite so distressingly full, but almost. There is a great imbalance between the number of people seeking to have their creative work released into the world, and the number of slots available. This means that lots of great work gets rejected because it’s too much like something else we’re already doing, or it’s perfectly competent but not distinctive enough. Maybe it’s pure genius, but slightly out of bounds with regard to genre or style.

I wrote once before about Degrees of Rejection, and because of my work with Hypnos, I know one thing for sure. Now, I’ve talked to writers who believe that a rejection is a rejection, and trying to argue that not all are equal amounts to self-delusion. The thing is, having sat on the opposite side of the desk taught me something. A huge difference exists between someone who is doing professional-level work, but missing certain details, or not quite a perfect fit, and someone who is falling far short. It doesn’t surprise me to read that editors reject certain stories on page one. I’ve rejected some demos less than a minute into the first track. Hell, some demos you can reject based on the dipshit cover letter, without having heard a single note, or based on the shirtless, Fabio-esque picture the guy enclosed. There is a great difference in how I respond to different categories of inquiries or demos, and I believe editors are no different.

The first thing an unpublished writer (or other artist) should seek to do, an interim goal they can strive for even before they actually break through, is to reach a level of competence and artistic potency such that their work is at least in the realm of serious consideration, even when it is not accepted. At that point, the gatekeeper listens to the whole demo (or reads the entire manuscript), possibly sticks it in the “maybe” pile, checks out the artist/writer’s web site, and replies with a personal note.

Of course, this all amounts to guessing and divination, trying to understand intention behind a rejection letter, which doesn’t really get you anything. That’s the kind of thing we grab hold of, though, while waiting.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Rejecter and Rejectee

  1. rob allen

    Hey Mike,

    I enjoyed this post today. I’m sure that it is pretty rare to be able to sit on both sides of the desk and be able to reflect on the dynamics and effects of those decisions.

    I have some hiring and not hiring to do today. All the not hires are competent artists but not the best fit in the current moment. I’ll try to let them know that instead of just “no”.

    Rob-

  2. Hi Rob, thanks for the comment.

    I really do think the “Rejecter” (*or is it Rejector?) can learn lessons from being rejection in other realms, and likewise the Rejectee can bear in mind lessons learned from sitting on the other side of the desk.

    To those who say “a rejection is a rejection,” I say “well yeah, in the sense that it always means you didn’t win.” But I know my own response to demos has ranged from derisive laughter, to tossing the thing into the trash after 30 seconds, to listening to parts of each track but not really enjoying any of it, to appreciation mixed with recognition that it’s not really right for my label… everything up to “this deserves to be released but I can’t do it right now.”

    Sometimes if a demo is unsolicited I don’t even respond, or my response might be a quick “no thanks,” but if the artist is sincere or talented, or has some kind of reputation at least then I’ll try to tell them what I think. The difference between two rejections can be huge in terms of likely future possibility that the artist in question might make it. Some rejections are “hell no” and some rejections are so close.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s