Blood and Other Cravings, Edited by Ellen Datlow

There are all kinds of reasons I might read a short fiction anthology. Maybe it’s the only place to find new work by some of my favorite writers. Some anthologies serve to introduce readers to unfamiliar writers, either total unknowns, or familiar names I’ve somehow not yet gotten around to reading. Many readers are motivated by an anthology’s theme — “Oh, I love zombies, and here’s another zombie anthology so of course I’ll buy it” — but I usually don’t. I didn’t buy this because it had to do with vampirism. In fact, I imagine any reader who purchased this hoping for a bunch of straightforward vampire stories would be disappointed. There’s not so much “blood” here as there are “other cravings.”

I’ve given some consideration to the overall shape of multi-author anthologies, a subject which interests me to the extent it’s similar to the way I’ve put together various-artists CD collections in the past. Generally it seems editors load the best stories end up at the beginning and the end, and this is no exception. Among the middle stories, the only one I found noteworthy was Melanie Tem’s very odd “Keeping Corky,” about an enigmatic female character, notable for her mental abnormalities including both strengths and deficiencies, misses the child she was forced to give up for adoption.

Of the early stories, Kaaron Warren’s lead-off “All You Can Do is Breathe” is wonderfully creepy and understated. Elizabeth Bear’s “Needles” is not so much a story as a well-drawn and entertaining “day in the (undead) life,” vividly written but maybe in need of fleshing-out. And Reggie Oliver’s amusing yet dark story of a theatrical hotel overrun by very small tenants convinced me to check out more of this writer’s work.

The best of this collection comes later. “First Breath” by a new-ish writer, Nicole J. LeBoeuf, is an interesting exploration of a sort of transference of life through breath. And I always love Kathe Koja and Carol Emshwiller, whose contributions here (Emshwiller’s is one of only two reprints) are good.

The final four stories alone justify the price of the anthology.

Michael Cisco’s “Bread and Water” tells of a captive vampire trying to cope with his appetites, as well as an incapacity to consume what he desires. The creature’s gradual transformation, told in Cisco’s uniquely intense prose, evokes in the reader an effect like delirium. More than anything else in the book, “Bread and Water” inspired me to seek out more by this writer. That’s not to say it was the best story overall, but the best by an author I’ve previously overlooked.

Margo Lanagan’s “The Mulberry Boys” is told like a fable or second-world fantasy more than a horror story, but what’s actually happening here has quite a nasty edge. Through some bizarre process of surgery and altered diet, humans or human-like creatures are transformed into passive silk factories. I love the way this story is told. Very effective.

“The Third Always Beside You” by John Langan reminds me a little of Peter Straub’s recent novel A Dark Matter in its exploration of a male character trying to piece together disturbing past events. Here a brother and sister discuss their long-held perception that their father might have been unfaithful to their mother, and whether any truth might lie behind this. The fantastic elements along the way are of the subtle “thought I heard a sound, and looked, but nobody was there” variety, yet the story conveys a mysterious and even dreadful sense of secrecy. I own two of Langan’s books which I haven’t read yet, but this story convinced me to nudge these upward in my “must read soon” list.

The last contribution is by Laird Barron, recently the most consistently excellent writer of horror and dark fantasy novellas and novelettes. “The Siphon” includes elements which may seem familiar to readers of Barron’s earlier stories, but this comes across not as repetition, but a fleshing-out of a fictional world which increasingly cross-connects between one story and another. None of the characters, so far as I can determine, appear in prior Barron tales, yet the template of bored, wealthy decadents tantalized by forbidden or occult knowledge is reminiscent of such stories as “Strappado” and “The Forest.” Such is Barron’s skill that even when he’s not trying something entirely new for him (as I believe he did in “The Men From Porlock” and “Blackwood’s Baby” which appear in other recent anthologies), the work nonetheless functions at such a high level as to stand clearly apart.

By the end of a relatively mixed collection, it’s tempting to think mostly of the more satisfying later stories, but the quality dropped off enough in places that I’d give the collection four rather than five stars. At the same time, I’d recommend the book as worthy of purchase for the better stories at the beginning and especially the end.

Check Out Weird Fiction Review’s New Ligotti Interview

Another day, another interview link. Well, this is more than that — also a heads-up about a great new and interesting web site created by Ann and Jeff VanderMeer: Weird Fiction Review. It’s great to see this sub-genre given such a clean and professional presentation. The site seems to have been created as a launching point for the VanderMeers’ massive upcoming anthology, The Weird, yet most of the content is only indirectly related to that volume.

There’s a lot to see here, but what inspires me to point people in that direction today is a fascinating new

William Gibson’s “Art of Fiction” Interview From Paris Review Is Now Online

I like William Gibson and consider him more interesting than most writers. I like his work, and I’m interested in how he’s transcended genre to become a nearly mainstream celebrity as exemplified by his appearance in a place like Paris Review. He’s a weird, smart, thoughtful guy.

This interview is worth a read if you’re a fan of Gibson, or if you’re a writer in any genre interested in writing process, or if you’re a reader curious about the point where futurism and science fiction intersect with a literary perspective. It covers a lot of ground, and reminds me that of the 20th and now 21st century’s best interviews of fiction writers, most are part of the Paris Reviews “The Art of Fiction” series.

http://www.theparisreview.org/interviews/6089/the-art-of-fiction-no-211-william-gibson

Recent Viewing: The Last Circus

You can never have too many stories about deranged Spanish clowns (a passive, sad one and an angry, violent one) vying for the love of a beautiful woman who happens to be an acrobat in their circus, set against the backdrop of the end of the Franco regime. Better yet, this sad clown has issues (possibly even his very sad-clown-ness itself) arising out of his father’s death at the hands of Franco’s men.

The Last Circus is one of the strangest things I’ve seen in a while. Not entirely successful but delightful in its looniness. At times funny, at times sweet, and eventually deranged, violent and completely over the top. Worth a look.

It’s November and I’m Not Writing a Novel

If you troll around on Livejournal this week (a blog platform used only by fiction writers and Russian revolutionaries, these days) you might think every writer who’s writing anything at all is writing a novel. It’s November. It’s NaNoWriMo. That’s what the cool kids call National Novel Writing Month.

I’m not writing a novel.

Waaaay back in my twenties I tried this “write a novel in a hurry” thing a couple of times. It worked out OK, and I might try it again some time. Maybe next November, even. But this November, I’m standing out from the crowd by NOT writing a novel.

I often tell people who aren’t using Scrivener that they really SHOULD be using Scrivener. Here’s an even better reason: There’s a Scrivener “NaNoWriMo” trial download here. You can use this free trial version during November, then if you write a novel with it and “win” NaNoWriMo you’ll get 50% off the purchase of a Scrivener license. Even if you don’t “win” you can use the “NaNoWriMo” code to get 20% off Scrivener, so why not give it a go?

Scrivener NaNoWriMo Trial.

Words In: Ready Player One by Ernest Cline

Sometimes I finish a book and I want to spend a lot of time thinking about it, and maybe write a discursive and possibly self-indulgent response to it.

Other times I finish a book and smile and say, “Damn, that was fun! More like this, please.” Ready Player One by Ernest Cline was like that.

It’s a dirty, disturbing vision of a year 2044 when just about everyone has given up living in the real world in favor of a virtual realm called the OASIS. People are so caught up in this game-like way of life they scarcely notice what’s going on outside. OASIS creator James Halliday has just died, and though he is the world’s wealthiest man, he’s also a hermit who left behind no heirs. He left behind an elaborate contest within the OASIS in which anyone and everyone can search for a hidden easter egg, and whoever finds it will inherit his vast fortune as well as control of his company. Millions set off in search of the egg, and when the novel begins the search has been underway for about five years, and nobody has yet found even the first of three keys, which will open the three gates (also hidden) which are necessary to obtain the egg.

The above may sound like spoilers but this is basically the setup within the first few pages, and the story proceeds from there. We meet Wade Watts, a young “egg hunter,” and follow his interactions with others on the same quest.

The quest itself is entertaining, but the real thing going on here is that James Halliday, a child of the 1980s, has sprinkled throughout the message he left behind announcing the contest a large number of hints and red herrings all taken from 80s pop culture — dialog from John Hughes movies, lyrics from an Oingo Boingo song and more. There are a few cultural tidbits on focus here which are outside my own historical interest — never much of a Black Tiger player here — but far more elements I recognize from my own trip through the decade of my adolescence. Arcade games like Tempest, Pac Man, Joust and Battlezone, movies like Blade Runner and Monty Python’s Holy Grail… the music, the Dungeons and Dragons. Such a lot of fun here! This is one of those books I want to recommend to anybody and everybody within five years of my age (those born in the 60s), and it might even be fun for people outside that range.

All Ernest Cline seems to have done before this book was to write the screenplay for the film Fanboys, a sort of trial run for the sort of geek obsessions on display here. I can’t wait to see what he does next, and fully expect to read this book again. Highly recommended, unless the kind of cultural references listed above are totally uninteresting to you.

Halloween Viewing – Scanners

Last night was Halloween, in case you were wondering why all the kids in your neighborhood were dressing funny. Lena and I wanted to watch some classic horror on DVD but nothing too overtly Halloween-y, and neither of us had seen Scanners in the five-plus years we’ve been together. Not too long ago we watched the next film David Cronenberg directed after this, Videodrome, which in my opinion was his first “fully Cronenberg” film. Scanners is the next step in his evolution from the somewhat ordinary indie horror of The Brood or Rabid, and further explores The Brood’s body horror themes.

We both fully enjoyed this mid-budget 1980 Canadian release, which featured a young Michael Ironside (with most of his hair intact), a crusty-looking Patrick McGoohan in stereotypical bearded scientist mode, and a leading man with absolutely no acting chops whatsoever.

I’ve watched Cronenberg’s Videodrome, Dead Ringers, Naked Lunch and Existenz over and over (this latter vastly underrated IMO), but this is my first visit to his pre-Videodrome work at least since the era of VHS. I’m interested in taking another look at The Brood soon as well. Cronenberg is a remarkably original filmmaker, even if his ideosyncrasies were not yet fully formed at this stage.

One Week After Reorg

I blogged last week about a plan to reorganize my approach to my fiction writing, and I can already see benefits.

I measure my progress by major milestones, such as new story first draft finished or a final draft polished and submitted, and minor ones like completed outlines/synopses or incremental drafts.

So far this week, since narrowing my focus down to just three stories, I’ve completed significant work on all three:

FFS — completed new incremental draft, handed over to Lena for a read-through and impressions/notes.

AIR — completed new incremental draft, handed over to Lena for a read-through and impressions/notes.

SS — reoutlined from scratch following input from editor who gave notes, and created a new Scrivener file with updated scene structure.

I also found time to create additional notes toward another story, EILW, which I will begin down the road. I’d like to have several queued up and ready to draft by the time I clear room in the top tier of three. At this point it looks like AIR will be done first among the three, though my gut tells me that FFS will end up being the better story, perhaps the best I’ve yet written.

He’s Got the Fire and the Fury

I don’t know about you, but when I hear too many people praising something (music, movie, book, TV show) I grow doubtful that I’ll enjoy it as much once I check it out. I should draw a graph plotting the way I become more convinced something might be good when I read more than just one positive review, but when praise grows too uniform, too ubiquitous I start to mistrust it. This is often a mistake on my part. I mean, if 5 good reviews mean I’ll probably like something, let’s say the new Captain America flick, then why wouldn’t dozens of good reviews and all kinds of “top 10 best ever” lists be even more convincing?

All the above is my explanation for why I waited so long to check out one of the most acclaimed television shows in history. A few months back I found a great price on the complete series box-set of HBO TV’s The Wire and Lena and I have been watching it since. Actually, there’s a lot of precedent for me watching a TV series this way (all at once, after it’s over). With one or two recent exceptions we don’t watch TV when it’s broadcast, but only on DVD or BluRay. And because I’ve always devoted so little time to TV shows (and Lena’s the same way, so this continued when we got together) I don’t usually jump right on a new show as soon as it comes out on DVD. In some cases like 24 or Sopranos or Six Feet Under I might buy Season 1 when the show’s third or fourth season is actually airing, and gradually catch up by watching the DVD seasons faster than one per year.

The Wire

The Wire, though, had been finished for several years by the time I got started. The hype was out there, unavoidable, but the nice thing about watching a show this far out of sync with the rest of the world is that it makes it much easier to avoid spoilers (which screwed up my enjoyment of the end of more than one other show). Sometimes a TV show takes a while for the writers and/or actors to grow into the characters, to figure out who’s interesting and why, and to get started exploring those interesting parts. The best-crafted shows end up making minor characters into major ones as they turn out to be interesting, while shifting focus away from less compelling major characters in compensation. The Wire seemed from the beginning to know who its best characters were, and while other major characters were revealed each season, this was more about the shifting focus of the show in general (each season had a central focus to counterbalance what was happening in the Baltimore PD, such as Baltimore’s drug-dealing criminal gangs, its schools, its longshoremen or its newspaper staff). The ongoing focus on the police kept a continuity running through all five seasons, and several minor characters (including Omar and Bubbles, respectively a Robin Hood-like thief among criminals, and a messed-up street-level drug addict, two of the more compelling characters in any television show I’ve ever seen) pop in and out regularly throughout every season.

I won’t bother to give a season-by-season breakdown in any greater detail than I’ve done above, but I’ve given some thought to the first point I talked about above, which is why this show is so universally acclaimed. Just about every writer or critic on the subject of television calls this show “best ever” or close to it, and I thought about this a lot while I was watching the show.

First, the writing is serious and adult, and assumes a certain intelligence on the part of the viewer. The story seems to have been carefully planned from beginning to end, structured so that each piece contributes to each other, and the viewer is responsible for keeping track of who’s who, and following narrative threads that drop off and pick up again years later without much explanation. The show “feels” more like a multi-part novel or work of ambitious cinema than something meant for television. Predictable outcomes rarely occur, and very often what feels like it should happen (a bad guy meeting a violent end, a corrupt politician or police official getting a public comeuppance) does not, yet the outcomes that do happen are satisfying. It feels real.

Second, the casting is unorthadox for American TV. Every person on this show looks like a real person, and there are no instances (so common on TV) of the Barbie and Ken syndrome, in which every character is played by an actor younger, prettier and more vapid-looking and -sounding than seems reasonable. There are a few decent-looking characters, lots of ordinary ones, and even a few crusty, ugly sorts. Particularly in the case of the street-level criminals, preference seems to be given to actors (in many cases non-actors) who are able to speak the dialog with authenticity or at least verisimilitude.

Third, each season has a specific focus and something to say about it, and as a unified whole the show does nothing less than examine how people live together in a city, how our social structures, civic entities and political leaders interface. Corruption is commonplace and exists on virtually all levels, and yet usually arises out of ordinary, believable human motivations rather than villainous or melodramatic notions like “evil.” I’ve never been to Baltimore, and don’t really care how much of this show arises out of or is inspired by the city’s true history. But I do feel like it says something important about the way a troubled, modern urban environment works and doesn’t work.

This may be the most ambitious story ever told on television. I could write dozens of blogs about the story, its implications and its characters. I could write a couple thousand words right now on the simple yet powerful transformation of Bubbles into Reginald and the way he finally got to sit at the table. Some characters failed,  some thrived. Bad guys got promotions or won awards, well-intentioned good guys went off the rails. People found redemption, or died trying.

Thomas Ligotti’s The Agonizing Resurrection of Victor Frankenstein

My copy of the new Centipede Press edition of The Agonizing Resurrection of Victor Frankenstein by Thomas Ligotti just arrived. Haven’t started reading yet, but the book is so beautiful it inspired me to take pictures.

Centipede often throws in extra stuff with your order. Last time it was some large art prints on loose sheets, plus a National Geographic map of Mexico. This time it was a book (not a Centipede edition) along with a note explaining that they thought this would appeal to fans of Thomas Ligotti.

This photo makes the book look tiny but it’s actually quite tall.

Front cover view on top of slipcase.

Hypnotic endpapers.

The illustration opposite the title page gives a sense of the quality of the artwork inserts.

Many beautiful color illustrations. What a luscious edition!

By the way, this book is already sold out at the publisher, though there are reportedly a few copies available at dealers here & there.